The web of international politics has always been fraught with tensions, secrets, and covert actions. A recent event that exemplifies this intricate dance of geopolitics is the mounting dispute between Canada and India. Canada’s accusation that Indian elements may have had a hand in the assassination of a Canadian citizen has sent shockwaves through the international community, reinvigorating the debate about the extent of foreign interference in domestic matters. While the heart of this debate beats loudly between Ottawa and New Delhi, echoes of similar concerns resonate elsewhere, notably in the United States, with the controversial journey of California’s SB 403 or anti-caste discrimination bill.
The Canadian incident, still under intense scrutiny, reflects a chilling global reality. Countries, for their geopolitical or ideological gains, are suspected of increasingly trespassing sovereign borders, not just through diplomatic channels, but by influencing or manipulating domestic events. As the boundaries of geopolitics become increasingly porous, the essence of democratic sovereignty and the sanctity of internal affairs come under a spotlight.
In the United States, this global reality hits home with SB 403. Designed as a beacon of progressiveness, intending to recognise caste within anti-discrimination statutes, the bill’s legislative journey has been overshadowed by a cloud of external influences. Reports suggest links to India’s ideological spectrum, notably Hindu nationalism and organisations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), creating a quagmire of international interests and local policies. Figures like Ajay Bhutoria, known for their affiliations, combined with the ambiguous roles of entities like Hindus for Human Rights and Equality Labs, further thicken the plot.
This story was originally published in theprint.in. Read the full story here .
